|
Issue of Concern
|
Arguments for Steel
|
Arguments for Wood
|
Env.Bldg.News Analysis
|
|
Dimensional properties and stability
|
Steel is far superior to wood--no shrinkage, exact dimensions.
|
Builders are used to the movement of wood, can use manufactured wood products for greater stability.
|
As framing lumber comes from younger and faster-growing trees, this is an important advantage of steel.
|
|
Pricing
|
Volatile wood prices make steel more predictable, lower cost in some areas.
|
Lumber prices dropping, even at their peak were no higher in real dollars than in 1970s.
|
Thinner gauge steel for non-load-bearing walls is cheap, efficient, a good deal.
|
|
Thermal efficiency
|
It's an issue but it can be resolved by adding exterior insulation or other modifications.
|
Wood is naturally low in conductivity, insulates well.
|
The number 1 problem with steel, this has to be addressed without adding too much cost or environmental impact.
|
|
Earthquake performance
|
Steel is better: engineered performance, lighter weight of structure reduces damage.
|
Wood is better because "structural redundancies" (overbuilding) add up to increased safety.
|
No position. Leave it to the experts.
|
|
Fire performance
|
Steel doesn't burn. Steel structures are safer.
|
Steel loses its strength quickly at high temperatures. Wood protected by drywall is safer.
|
No position. Leave it to the experts.
|
|
Insect resistance
|
Steel is not attractive to insects; wood is.
|
Preservative-treated wood is safe, effective.
|
Borate preservatives are safe. It's probably better to use steel than frame with wood treated with arsenical preservatives.
|
|
Indoor air quality
|
Steel is inert; wood releases terpenes and treated wood contains toxins.
|
Untreated wood causes no problem for most people.
|
Avoiding soil treatments with termiticides is the biggest IAQ benefit of steel. Otherwise both are relatively safe.
|
|
Timber resource availability and extraction
|
Forest are being overlogged and destroyed. Builders need to stop using timber.
|
Wood is renewable: nationwide new growth exceeds amounts harvested; forestry practices are improving.
|
Widely variable by region, forest, and company/agency managing. We should strive for true multi-use ecosystem management in most areas.
|
|
Steel resource availability and extraction
|
All raw materials used to make steel framing are in plentiful supply. Mining practices have improved dramatically. Much new steel is made from scrap.
|
Mining causes total disruption of the affected area, and has caused severe water pollution from run-off.
|
Recycled content of light-gauge steel is much less than most other steel. Mining impacts are significant, but raw materials are plentiful.
|
|
Lumber manufacturing
|
Significant fuel use for kiln-drying. Preservative-treating industry deals with high-level toxins.
|
Milling lumber is a very low-energy, simple process with minimal emissions or other pollution.
|
Except for treated wood, concerns are minor. Big advantage for wood use.
|
|
Steel manufacturing
|
Industry has invested $10 billion in environmental and efficiency improvements in last decade. Energy use and pollution are way down. High recycling rate means some environmental costs are spread out.
|
Steel is one of the most energy-intensive industrial materials, generating pollution and waste from all stages of the process, including coking coal, purifying iron, and galvanizing.
|
In spite of improvements, environmental impacts are still significant.
|
|
End-of-use recycling or disposal
|
Steel is easily separated by magnet. There is always a market for scrap; contamination is not an issue.
|
Wood is biodegradable, may be salvaged and reused. Markets for recycled waste wood from construction are growing.
|
Big advantage for steel. Another reason not to use wood treated with toxins, as it won't biodegrade, may have to be handled as hazardous waste.
|